
The problem of accuracte imposition of essential boundary conditions in the element free Galerkin method is discussed. Using this method some difficulties often occur, because the moving least squares interpolants used in this method lack the delta function property of the usual finite element or boundary element method shape functions. A simple and logical strategy to avoid the above problem is proposed. In this method a discrete norm is typically minimized in order to obtain certain variable coefficients. The strategy is proposed to involve the new definition of this discrete norm. It is shown that the proposed strategy works satisfactory in all numerical examples for the 2-D potential problems, which are presented in the paper. A discussion of the boundary condition is given and some recommendations regarding strategies for refinements in order to improve the accuracy of the numerical solution of the proposed method is made.
numerical examples, Boundary value problems for second-order elliptic equations, boundary element, essential boundary conditions, finite element, moving least squares interpolants, element free Galerkin method, discrete norm, Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs
numerical examples, Boundary value problems for second-order elliptic equations, boundary element, essential boundary conditions, finite element, moving least squares interpolants, element free Galerkin method, discrete norm, Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 133 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
