
We address the problem, proposed by Gerth, of verifying that a simplified version of the lazy caching algorithm of Afek, Brown, and Merritt is sequentially consistent. We specify the algorithm and sequential consistency in TLA+, a formal specification language based on TLA (the Temporal Logic of Actions). We then describe how to construct and check a formal TLA correctness proof.
lazy caching, [INFO.INFO-OH] Computer Science [cs]/Other [cs.OH], algorithm, correction, verification, algorithme
lazy caching, [INFO.INFO-OH] Computer Science [cs]/Other [cs.OH], algorithm, correction, verification, algorithme
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
