
pmid: 10968240
Self-medication is a common event. To use drugs correctly, a basic knowledge about drugs is required. Poor data are available about adults' drug knowledge. Furthermore, adolescents' basic drug knowledge has not been investigated. This study was designed in order to explore adolescents' drug use and knowledge and the factors that influence them. A total of 56 tenth grade students between 15-17 years of age at a secondary school in Dresden, Germany were enrolled in a pilot study by answering a self-completion questionnaire. Of adolescents, 57% took from one to six different drugs in the 2 weeks before questioning. In particular, a chronic consumption of non-opioid analgesics was found. Some 15% of adolescents took headache remedies at least several times per month. Self-acquisition occurred more often for these drugs than for any other drug group. The best score for drug knowledge was 10 out of 13 possible points and only 43% of students attained from 7 to 10 points. Astonishingly, more than two-thirds of adolescents could not describe in their own words how a medicinal agent is ingested. Female gender and a chronic drug consumption were detected as influencing factors of better drug knowledge.The results indicate that adolescents gain drug knowledge through drug consumption and not before taking drugs. This leads to a potential risk particularly in the case of self-medication.
Male, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Pilot Projects, Self Medication, Drug Utilization, Drug Therapy, Adolescent Behavior, Germany, Surveys and Questionnaires, Educational Status, Humans, Female, Attitude to Health
Male, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Pilot Projects, Self Medication, Drug Utilization, Drug Therapy, Adolescent Behavior, Germany, Surveys and Questionnaires, Educational Status, Humans, Female, Attitude to Health
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 83 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
