Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Polar Biologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Polar Biology
Article . 2001 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Bioerosive processes in Antarctic seas

Authors: CERRANO, CARLO; BAVESTRELLO, GIORGIO; CALCINAI B.; CATTANEO VIETTI, RICCARDO; CHIANTORE, MARIACHIARA; GUIDETTI M.; SARÀ A.;

Bioerosive processes in Antarctic seas

Abstract

To date, marine boring organisms are not known for the whole Antarctic region, probably because of the scarcity of calcareous substrata. In Terra Nova Bay (Ross Sea), the study of some populations of the scallop Adamussium colbecki allowed us to record a bioerosive activity on carbonates due to a chlorophyte, belonging to the genus Phaeophyla. The same kind of infestation was also observed on the thick shells of the gastropod Neobuccinum eatoni. The algae actively bore the light-exposed portions of the shells showing, in A. colbecki, an infestation that is strongly size dependent; the ageing of the periostracum is among the most probable causes. The pattern of infestation is not homogeneous in different populations, probably in relation to irradiance intensity; depth, sedimentation rates and ice cover negatively affect the growth and distribution of Phaeophyla sp.

Country
Italy
Keywords

bioerosion; Phaeophyla; Adamussium colbecki; Antarctica

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    16
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
16
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!