Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Marine Biologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Marine Biology
Article . 1997 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Mechanics of prey selection by ephyrae of the scyphomedusa Aurelia aurita

Authors: B. K. Sullivan; C. L. Suchman; J. H. Costello;

Mechanics of prey selection by ephyrae of the scyphomedusa Aurelia aurita

Abstract

In situ feeding patterns of ephyrae of the jellyfish Aurelia aurita (Linnaeus) revealed the importance of relatively large (>1 mm) prey in the diet of these scyphozoan predators. These studies were carried out in Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, USA in March and April, from 1993 through 1996. Rotifers were the only small prey ingested in quantity, and then only when they were unusually abundant in the plankton. Copepod nauplii, similar in size to rotifers and equally abundant, were rarely consumed. Since copepods evince rapid escape responses, this observation suggested a role for prey escape in determining prey vulnerability, while the predominance of large prey in the diet suggested a role for prey size. Using two dimensional video observations of free-swimming ephyrae and their prey in the laboratory we tested hypotheses about the mechanisms underlying these dietary patterns, comparing mechanisms for capture of large versus small prey and for prey of equal size but differing escape behaviors. Capture efficiencies of ephyrae feeding on large prey were 4 to 12 times greater than for small prey taxa. Capture efficiencies for prey of equal size also differed significantly, indicating that other factors influence the outcome of predator–prey interactions. Most prey captures occurred while the ephyrae were swimming and creating fluid flows that entrained prey into the subumbrellar region. Even copepod nauplii were frequently drawn into the subumbrella of swimming ephyrae despite average potential escape velocities (25.7 mm s−1) that exceeded mean maximum velocity of fluid flows around the ephyrae (13.1 mm s−1). Large prey were more likely than small prey to contact nematocyst-bearing surfaces both before and after entrainment in flow fields. With regard to behavior, prey escape speeds were not the only predictor of prey vulnerability. Prey that continued swimming after entrainment (rotifers and brine shrimp) were captured more often than prey of equal size that ceased normal swimming (copepod nauplii and barnacle nauplii). Copepod nauplii were the prey least likely to be captured because they either “played dead” and were expelled from the subumbrella of the ephyrae before contacting a surface, or they eventually escaped at high velocity. These observations indicate that size-selective predation by ephyrae of A. aurita can be influenced by a variety of behavioral responses of the prey.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    56
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
56
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!