
Let \(X_1, X_2, \ldots, X_n\) be independent and identically distributed with density \(f\), and set \(X=\) \(\{ X_1, \ldots, X_n \}.\) \(\phi\) denotes the standard normal density and for \(\sigma >0\) let \(\phi(x, \sigma^2) = \sigma^{-1}\phi(x\sigma^{-1}).\) The authors consider kernel estimators for \(f\): the Gaussian kernel estimator with bandwidth \(b\), \(\hat f_b (x, X_n)\), that is \(\hat f_b (x, X_n) = n^{-1} \sum_{i=1}^n \phi (x - X_i, b^2)\), and the smoothed bootstrap mean integrated squared error estimator with pilot bandwidth \(b_p\), that is \[ \hat \Psi (b, b_p) = E \bigl[ \int (\hat f(x, Y_n) - \hat f_{b_p} (x, X_n))^2 dx |X_n], \] where \(Y = (Y_1, \ldots, Y_n)\) is a random sample of size \(n\) with density \(\hat f_{b_p}.\) They consider the case when \(f\) is a normal \(N\)-mixture density. In this case the expectation of \(\hat \Psi (b, b_p)\) and the mean squared error of \(\hat \Psi (b, b_p)\) are found. These results are easily computable. They are used to study the exact behaviour of the estimator for selected unimodal and bimodal densities. A noteworthy observation is that while asymptotics call for oversmoothing the estimator, the undersmoothing way in fact is more appropriate for small samples.
Density estimation, Bootstrap, jackknife and other resampling methods, smoothed cross-validation, Nonparametric statistical resampling methods, pilot bandwidth selection, bandwidth selection, normal mixtures, kernel estimators
Density estimation, Bootstrap, jackknife and other resampling methods, smoothed cross-validation, Nonparametric statistical resampling methods, pilot bandwidth selection, bandwidth selection, normal mixtures, kernel estimators
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
