
An interspecific partial genetic linkage map of Coffea sp. based on 62 backcross hybrids is presented. F1 hybrids were generated by a cross between the wild C. pseudozanguebariae and the anciently cultivated C. liberica var. dewevrei (DEW); progeny were then derived from a backcross between F1 hybrid and DEW. The map construction consisted of a two-step strategy using 5.5 and 3.1 LOD scores revealed by simulation file. The map consisted of 181 loci: 167 amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) and 13 random fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) loci. The markers were assembled into 14 linkage groups, each with 4–31 markers covering 1,144 cM. Segregation distortion was observed for 30% of all loci, in particular 3:1 and 1:3 ratios equally favouring each of the two parents. The existence of such ratios suggests genetic conversion events. This map also represents an initial step towards the detection of quantitative trait loci.
[SDV.GEN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics, DISTORSION DE SEGREGRATION, 330, TECHNIQUE RFLP, CARTE GENETIQUE, DISTORSION DE SEGREGATION, AMELIORATION DES PLANTES, [SDV.GEN] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics, TECHNIQUE AFLP, 630, CAFE, TECHNIQUE PCR, ETUDE EXPERIMENTALE, MARQUEUR MOLECULAIRE, ANALYSE GENETIQUE, GENETIQUE VEGETALE, LIAISON GENETIQUE
[SDV.GEN]Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics, DISTORSION DE SEGREGRATION, 330, TECHNIQUE RFLP, CARTE GENETIQUE, DISTORSION DE SEGREGATION, AMELIORATION DES PLANTES, [SDV.GEN] Life Sciences [q-bio]/Genetics, TECHNIQUE AFLP, 630, CAFE, TECHNIQUE PCR, ETUDE EXPERIMENTALE, MARQUEUR MOLECULAIRE, ANALYSE GENETIQUE, GENETIQUE VEGETALE, LIAISON GENETIQUE
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 95 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
