Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Ecosystemsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Ecosystems
Article . 2003 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Net Ecosystem Production of Two Contrasting Boreal Black Spruce Forest Communities

Authors: Kari E. B. O'Connell; Stith T. Gower; John M. Norman;

Net Ecosystem Production of Two Contrasting Boreal Black Spruce Forest Communities

Abstract

The objective of this study was to compare the carbon (C) budgets of two similar-aged boreal black spruce (Picea mariana [Mill.] BSP) forest communities: closed-canopy black spruce with feathermoss ground cover (BSFM) on moderately drained soils and open-canopy black spruce with Sphagnum ground cover (BSSP) on poorly drained soils. C content, soil surface carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) flux (R s ), heterotrophic respiration (R H ), net primary production (NPP), and net ecosystem production (NEP) were measured or estimated. The total C content for the two communities (BSFM, 113 Mg C ha -1 ; BSSP, 107 Mg C ha -1 ) did not differ significantly (P = 0.95). However, annual R s was significantly greater (P < 0.0001) for the BSFM (564 g C m -2 y -1 ) than the BSSP (319 g C m -2 y -1 ) community. The greater R H in the BSFM (440 g C m -2 y -1 ) than the BSSP community (264 g C m -2 y -1 ) and the higher peat C content for the BSSP (84 Mg C ha -1 ) than the BSFM (34 Mg C ha -1 ) community provided evidence that the BSSP community had a lower decomposition rate than the BSFM community. NEP was significantly (P = 0.04) more negative for the BSFM community (-222 ± 35 g C m -2 y -1 ) than the BSSP community (-128 ± 14 g C m -2 y -1 ), but both communities were C sources to the atmosphere. The results from this study illustrate the influence of small differences in edaphic conditions on ecosystem C accumulation.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    56
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
56
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Related to Research communities
Italian National Biodiversity Future Center
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!