
doi: 10.1007/pl00014666
Integrative gravity modelling reveals the 3D shape, subsurface extent and basal morphology of the late-Variscan granites in the northwestern Bohemian Massif. The combination of the results with structural and geochronological data enables the interpretation of the morphogenesis and the tectonic setting of the granite emplacement. For the subsurface shaping two gravity methods were used: the Linsser filtering and the 2.5D density modelling. The Linsser filtering enables tomographic analyses of the gravity field in successive depth levels. The 2.5D density models were computed by the GRAVMAG program (version 1.5, British Geological Survey) which interprets gravity data vs. geological cross sections. At depth, the granites show steep- and flat-sided, wedge-like plutons which are generally elongated in north–northwest–south–southeast direction. The maximum basal depths between 3 and 8 km occur along the root zones indicated by high gravity magnitudes. The western- and easternmost granites (e.g. Leuchtenberg, Bor) are deeply eroded, whereas the granites in the central part (e.g. Falkenberg, Rozvadov) are greatly buried in the metamorphic host rocks. In the northern Oberpfalz, the plutons show a west-sided basal asymmmetry, and in the western Bohemia, in contrast, the plutons have an east-sided basal asymmetry. The steep pluton flanks parallel north–northwest–south–southeast gravity gradients which result from the high density contrast of the granites and host rocks. The density contrasts are caused by steep faults which enabled the emplacement of the granites. The shape, basal morphology, depth and volume of the plutons presume a genetic link between magma intrusion and shear deformation. However, the orientation of the plutons 15–20° off the trend of the major faults and structural data suggest emplacement into opening fractures along initially transtensional faults owing to the Lower to Upper Carboniferous extension in the northwestern Bohemian Massif.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
