
doi: 10.1007/pl00012013
AbstractLeaf shelters indirectly mediate interactions in animal–plant communities by providing the occupants with several kinds of benefits, as physical ecosystem engineering. The occupants benefit from favorable microhabitat, reduction in antiherbivore defense, and protection from natural enemies. The primary shelter maker has to spend energy and time and producing silk, but shelter users have great advantages without incurring costs. Shelter users consist of a wide range of arthropod taxa and can be divided into two groups: coexisting organisms that live with a primary shelter maker in the same shelter, and secondary users, which inhabit a leaf shelter after it is utilized by a shelter maker. Leaf shelters mediate interactions between (1) primary shelter makers and coexisting organisms or (2) primary shelter makers and secondary users, (3) secondary users, (4) shelter users and their natural enemies, and (5) primary shelter makers, secondary users, and their host plants. Most interactions between primary shelter makers and coexisting organisms constitute a direct trophic linkage rather than indirect ones. There are actually unidirectional beneficial effects from a primary shelter maker to secondary shelter users, whereas leaf shelters mediate competition and predation among shelter users. By providing a leaf shelter, a shelter maker leads to increased diversity of interactions. Leaf shelters modify the distribution of organisms on the host plant and influence herbivory on the host plant. In tritrophic interactions, leaf shelters act as cues for natural enemies that search for a shelter user as prey. Furthermore, by enhancing habitat heterogeneity, leaf shelters affect the abundance and species richness of arthropods on host plants.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 89 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
