Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Neurosurgical Reviewarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Neurosurgical Review
Article . 2001 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Recurrence of benign spinal neoplasms

Authors: U, Schick; G, Marquardt; R, Lorenz;

Recurrence of benign spinal neoplasms

Abstract

The outcome of surgical treatment of benign spinal neoplasms is considered to be excellent, with good improvement of neurological function. The risk of recurrence is estimated to be very low, except with subtotal resections. This retrospective study was designed to establish the course of illness, clinical outcome, and recurrence rate of benign spinal tumours. We present an overview of the clinical outcome and surgical treatment of 197 benign spinal tumours carried out in our centre from 1980 to 1999. Clinical history, signs, surgical approach, outcome, and radiological reports were obtained by reviewing patient charts. The most frequent benign tumour was meningeoma (41%), closely followed by neurinoma (33%) and neurofibroma (6.1%). Of all tumours, 79.7% were completely resected. Recurrence happened in 10.2% on an average of 4.3 years postoperatively. Only 2 patients suffered from neurofibromatosis. All neurinomas were completely resected at first operation, whereas three out of seven recurrent meningeomas and all ependymomas were classified as subtotally resected. Seventy per cent were treated by repeated surgical intervention. Benign tumours usually can be completely removed without adding to patients' neurological deficits. Benign tumours recur in 10.2% of cases, thus requiring long-term follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies are recommended up to 5 years postoperatively as a routine procedure.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Neurologic Examination, Neurofibroma, Spinal Neoplasms, Middle Aged, Spine, Diagnosis, Differential, Treatment Outcome, Spinal Cord, Meningeal Neoplasms, Humans, Female, Epidural Neoplasms, Spinal Cord Neoplasms, Neoplasm Recurrence, Local, Meningioma, Neurilemmoma, Aged, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    56
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
56
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!