
doi: 10.1007/pl00011665
Despite the fact that artificial neural networks (ANNs) are universal function approximators, their black box nature (that is, their lack of direct interpretability or expressive power) limits their utility. In contrast, univariate decision trees (UDTs) have expressive power, although usually they are not as accurate as ANNs. We propose an improvement, C-Net, for both the expressiveness of ANNs and the accuracy of UDTs by consolidating both technologies for generating multivariate decision trees (MDTs). In addition, we introduce a new concept, recurrent decision trees, where C-Net uses recurrent neural networks to generate an MDT with a recurrent feature. That is, a memory is associated with each node in the tree with a recursive condition which replaces the conventional linear one. Furthermore, we show empirically that, in our test cases, our proposed method achieves a balance of comprehensibility and accuracy intermediate between ANNs and UDTs. MDTs are found to be intermediate since they are more expressive than ANNs and more accurate than UDTs. Moreover, in all cases MDTs are more compact (i.e., smaller tree size) than UDTs.
Computing methodologies and applications, Database theory, 006, Keywords: C5, Information storage and retrieval of data, Univariate decision trees, C5, Multivariate decision trees, Neural networks
Computing methodologies and applications, Database theory, 006, Keywords: C5, Information storage and retrieval of data, Univariate decision trees, C5, Multivariate decision trees, Neural networks
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
