
doi: 10.1007/pl00000351
A lattice is join semidistributive if it satisfies the implication \[ \alpha \vee \beta = \alpha \vee \gamma \Rightarrow \alpha \vee \beta = \alpha \vee (\beta \wedge \gamma ). \] For \(\alpha ,\beta ,\gamma \in \text{Con}{\mathcal A}\) define recursively \(\beta ^0 =\beta , \, \gamma ^0 =\gamma , \,\beta ^{n+1} =\beta \wedge (\alpha \vee \gamma ^n), \, \gamma ^{n+1} = \gamma \wedge ( \alpha \vee \beta ^n)\). The main result: Let \({\mathcal V}\) be a locally finite variety. Then \({\mathcal V}\) is congruence join semidistributive if for some integer \(n\), \({\mathcal V}\) satisfies \[ \alpha \vee (\beta \wedge \gamma ) = (\alpha \vee \beta ^n) \wedge (\alpha \vee \gamma ^n) \] as a congruence identity. This identity is strong enough to force join semidistributivity in any lattice.
Equational logic, Mal'tsev conditions, Congruence modularity, congruence distributivity, semidistributivity, congruence identity, congruence variety
Equational logic, Mal'tsev conditions, Congruence modularity, congruence distributivity, semidistributivity, congruence identity, congruence variety
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
