
doi: 10.1007/bfb0054854
Primality proving by cyclotomy is an extension of the Jacobi sum primality test, initially proposed by Adleman, Rumely and Pomerance [3] and implemented by H. Cohen and A. Lenstra [7]. In his presentation of the algorithm of Adleman, Rumely and Pomerance at the Bourbaki Seminar 1981 [14], H. W. Lenstra Jr. proposed under the name of “Galois theory test” the idea to combine classical Lucas — Lehmer tests with the Jacobi sum test. This idea was first studied and implemented by Bosma and van der Hulst in their thesis [6]. In our recently completed thesis [19], we considered the topic anew, from a slightly changed perspective and made an implementation which allowed establishing new general primality testing records. In this paper we shall give an overview of cyclotomy from the perspective of the recent research and implementation. We also discuss the drawbacks of the algorithm — the overpolynomial run time and lack of certificates — and mention some open problems which may lead to future improvements.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
