Belief revision by expansion

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Part of book or chapter of book , Conference object , Article 01 Jan 1993Publisher:Springer Berlin Heidelberg

Authors: Cees Witteveen; Wiebe van der Hoek;

doi: 10.1007/bfb0028224

Belief revision by expansion

- Summary
- Metrics

Abstract

We show that the standard framework for belief revision has to be adapted in order to deal with revision in non-monotonic theories. The reason is that sometimes expanding a theory seems to be more appropriate than contracting it in order to remove inconsistencies that occur as a consequence of adopting a non-standard semantics. We illustrate this approach by applying revision by expansion truth maintenance.

Related Organizations

Utrecht University
Netherlands
Delft University of Technology
Netherlands

Impact byBIP!

	selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	1
	popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.	Average
	influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).	Average
	impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.	Average