
doi: 10.1007/bfb0017491
A word on alphabet π={u, r, d, l} can be thought of as a description of a connected picture drawn on a square grid: each letter is associated with a unit move of a pen, u coding a move up, r, d and l coding moves to the right, down and to the left. We define the notion of superposition of two pictures f and g as the set of pictures obtained when one draws first f and then g with the sole constraint that the resulting picture must be connected. We show that superposition does not preserve regularity of classical chain-code picture languages, as defined by Maurer and al. [12]. On the other hand, we prove, using constructive methods, that regular descriptive ”branch-picture” languages, introduced by Gutbrod.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
