
doi: 10.1007/bf03400009
Public criticism of psychiatry is well taken in some areas, such as neglect of the chronic psychotic patient. Public mistrust of professionals in general is coupled with the demand for more physicians and student demand for relevance, all of which may lead to a degradation of scholarship. Graduate teaching should not be just to produce craftsmen; there must be opportunities to pursue “useless” knowledge. Government interference has added to the overmanagement of medicine. Rules and regulations proliferate—from the public, the National Board, and the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology (ABPN)—while movements to shorten the undergraduate, medical school, internship, and residency years are gaining support. Change may be good, but large-scale changes must be adequately debated and discussed rather than casually ordered without proper evaluation. Psychiatrists serve as bridges between genetics, biology, and all of clinical medicine on the one hand and the behavioral sciences on the other. Their scholarship must not be neglected.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
