
(a) To evaluate body fat in men with prolactinoma and healthy controls, using whole body dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and (b) to correlate DXA results with anthropometry and clinical aspects of male prolactinomas.A cross-sectional study was performed in two University referral centers. Eleven newly-diagnosed men with prolactinoma and 9 with normal PRL levels due to dopamine agonist treatment were submitted to DXA and blood analysis (PRL, testosterone, dihydrotestosterone, estradiol, and SHBG) by the time of their clinical evaluation. They were compared with 14 control men of similar age and body mass index distribution.Newly-diagnosed men with prolactinoma had higher fat percentage in the arms and the total body, when compared with patients treated with dopamine agonists and controls. The former group also presented higher fat percentage in the legs than the controls. Truncal fat percentage of the newly-diagnosed patients was lower than the dopamine agonist treated group. The 3 groups had similar android and gynoid fat contents. Fat percentage of the 6 sites correlated with PRL, testosterone, and dihydrotestosterone levels.Newly-diagnosed men with prolactinomas had higher body fat content. Body fat was linked to disease control, especially to the PRL and androgen levels. Consequently, adequate control of hyperprolactinemia should be pursued in order to reduce the risk of obesity and its metabolic complications in men with prolactinoma.
Adult, Male, obesity, Cabergoline, PRL, androgen, Body fat; PRL; androgen; hyperprolactinemia; prolactinoma; obesity, Absorptiometry, Photon, Cross-Sectional Studies, Adipose Tissue, Body fat, hyperprolactinemia, prolactinoma, Dopamine Agonists, Humans, Prolactinoma, Ergolines
Adult, Male, obesity, Cabergoline, PRL, androgen, Body fat; PRL; androgen; hyperprolactinemia; prolactinoma; obesity, Absorptiometry, Photon, Cross-Sectional Studies, Adipose Tissue, Body fat, hyperprolactinemia, prolactinoma, Dopamine Agonists, Humans, Prolactinoma, Ergolines
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 26 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
