
doi: 10.1007/bf03321381
This paper presents a mathematical model to forecast the level of residual δ ferrite in terms of FN in austenitic stainless steel welds at cooling rates between 10 °C/s up to 103 °C/s. With this aim, two series of austenitic steel specimens were prepared using an electric arc remelt furnace. Whilst the alloying level was kept constant at [Creq+Nieq] = 30 % and [Creq+Nieq] = 40 %, the Creq/Nieq ratio was gradually increased from 1.22 up to 2.00 in each series. For each alloying level, a highly correlated polynomial function (FN vs. Creq /Nieq ), was found, being Creq and Nieq Hammar and Svensson’s equivalents. These experimental results have led to the importance of [Creq +Nieq] and (Creq /Nieq ) variables in the forecast of the residual ferrite content and a general expression including both variables is proposed. $${\rm \bf FN=54.22-126.26(Cr_{eq}+Ni_{eq})+\lbrack-48.11+37.14(Cr_{eq}+Ni_{eq})\rbrack \Big({Cr_{eq}\over Ni_{eq}}\Big)+\lbrack-0.23+61.95(Cr_{eq}+Ni_{eq})\rbrack \Big({Cr_{eq}\over Ni_{eq}}\Big)^2}$$ The proposed model is able to forecast the level of δ ferrite with a mean error of +1.01 FN within a deviation of +/- 2.12 FN with 95 % probability by just considering the chemical composition of the alloy. This level of error has been proved to be lower than DeLong’s and WRC-1988 diagrams errors. Moreover, the proposed model has also been compared with WRC-1992 diagram and FNN-1999 neural network and it provides a more accurate FN forecast within the range of compositions and cooling rates considered.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
