Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Wetlandsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Wetlands
Article . 1999 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Response of breeding birds to shearing and burning in wetland brush ecosystems

Authors: Jo Ann M. Hanowski; Donald P. Christian; Mark C. Nelson;

Response of breeding birds to shearing and burning in wetland brush ecosystems

Abstract

In the absence of wildfire, emergent wetlands in the American Midwest often succeed to a shrub/scrub wetland type. Management activities, including shearing and burning are typically used to remove shrub, resulting in a more open emergent wetland condition. We surveyed breeding birds in managed and unmanaged shrub/scrub wetlands in northeast Minnesota, USA, in 1996 and 1997 to examine breeding bird response to management type (burning and shearing) and time elapsed since management. In a comparison of 58 managed sites and 58 unmanaged sites in 1996, unmanaged sites had more (P<0.05) species and individuals than managed sites. In addition, 12 of 20, individual species tested differed significantly (P<0.05) in abundance between the groups. Species associated with emergent wetland type, like the Sedge Wren (Cistothorus platensis) and LeConte’s Sparrow (Ammodramus leconteii) were more, abundant (P<0.05) in managed sites, and species that require shrubs, such as the Alder Flycatcher (Empidonax alnorum) and Golden-winged Warbler (Vermivora chrysoptera) were more abundant (P<0.05) in unmanaged sites. Examination of the effects of management type on breeding birds by either burning, shearing, or, both treatments on sites surveyed in 1997 revealed results similar to comparisons of managed and unmanaged sites completed in 1996. In addition, breeding bird composition, was not different on sites that varied in time elapsed since management. In these latter comparisons, breeding bird species and community composition were similar among all managed sites but differed from the unmanaged sites.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    16
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
16
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!