<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.1007/bf03025209
In the paper under review the author develops some ideas about intercommunications and distinctions between combinatorics and algebra, considering as examples two problems from combinatorics and algebra respectively. His considerations are summarized in the following three main principles: 1. Algebra and Combinatorics are fundamentally different in nature. This improves their compatibility because the strengths of one area match the weaknesses of the other. 2. The interplay between Algebra and Combinatorics is a crucial ingredient in computational methods used by algebraists and combinatorialists. 3. Algebraic Combinatorics can reveal connections between seemingly unrelated problems in Algebra and Combinatorics.
algebraic combinatorics, Hochschild homology, Algebraic combinatorics, order, disorder
algebraic combinatorics, Hochschild homology, Algebraic combinatorics, order, disorder
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |