
doi: 10.1007/bf02994066
Goal and Scope. It has been highlighted in the paper that, due to their inherent limitations, standard or traditional accounting practices are incapable of capturing the fact that 'Pollution Prevention Pays', i.e. reducing the environmental impacts can also lower costs of a product while meeting all other critical requirements. As such, environmentally preferable design often may not be the lowest-cost option when measured by standard accounting systems and methods. Total Cost Assessment (TCA), which provides the foundation for life cycle accounting, is discussed. Full Cost Assessment (FCA), conducted by adding hidden, liability and less tangible costs to the usual costs, is also discussed. Benefits of the TCA and FCA models for accounting over their traditional counterpart, i.e. standard accounting, are also discussed.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
