
doi: 10.1007/bf02944984
As shown in [1], the existence of a one-to-one order preserving m a p p i n g f from a partially ordered set P onto a partially ordered set Q and a one-to-one order preserving mapping g from Q onto P does not imply that P and Q are isomorphic. Below we show that, under these conditions, P 'and Q are isomorphic provided each is a partially well ordered set. Let us recall that a subset S of a partially ordered set is called diverse if and only if every two distinct elements of S are uncomparable. A partially ordered set is called partially well ordered [2] if and only if it has no infinite strictly decreasing sequence and no infinite diverse subset. Let (M, ~<) be a partially ordered set which has no infinite strictly decreasing sequence. Motivated by the canonical decomposition [2] of a partially well ordered set, we define a minimal decomposition of (M, ~< ) as follows. Exactly, as in [2], for every ordinal u we let: M u = {x ] x is a minimal element of M I._J Mi}. (1) i < u I f My = 0 for some ordinal v then
Partial orders, general
Partial orders, general
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
