
doi: 10.1007/bf02942314
In two earlier papers of the second author geometric lattices G with a topology \({\mathcal T}\) were investigated, with compatibility conditions partly weaker than the continuity of the join and of the meet. It is natural to ask, why not simply require (G,\({\mathcal T})\) to be a topological lattice? The present paper answers this question: This requirement would be too strong, leaving only trivial topologies, and the Alexandrov topology and its dual.
topological lattices, Topological lattices, Semimodular lattices, geometric lattices, geometric lattices
topological lattices, Topological lattices, Semimodular lattices, geometric lattices, geometric lattices
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
