
doi: 10.1007/bf02892060
This paper focuses on a comparison of several imputation procedures within the simple additive model \(y=f(x)+\varepsilon\), where the independent variable \(x\) is affected by missing completely randomly. Such imputation methods as complete case analysis, mean imputation plus random noise, single imputation and two kinds of nearest neighbour imputations are investigated and compared within a simulation experiment based on the sample mean squared error, estimated variances and sample bias of the estimates of \(f(x)\) at the knots.
imputation methods, stochastic mean imputation, Monte Carlo methods, missing data, Numerical smoothing, curve fitting, nearest neighbour imputation, Nonparametric regression and quantile regression, complete case analysis, Computational methods for problems pertaining to statistics, additive model
imputation methods, stochastic mean imputation, Monte Carlo methods, missing data, Numerical smoothing, curve fitting, nearest neighbour imputation, Nonparametric regression and quantile regression, complete case analysis, Computational methods for problems pertaining to statistics, additive model
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
