Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao The Botanical Reviewarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The Botanical Review
Article . 1944 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

The classification of inflorescences

Authors: H. W. Rickett;

The classification of inflorescences

Abstract

To a science which prides itself upon precision of language, any confusion in terms is a reproach. The terms of systematic botany enjoy a respectable antiquity, but sometimes lend a regrettable obscurity to the scene. The names applied to inflorescences were confused from the beginning. In current manuals they are usually classified as determinate (cymose) or indeterminate (racemose). Umbels and panicles are included among the latter; yet the same manuals will refer to the compound determinate clusters of Allium, Pelargonium and Asclepias as umbels and to the aggregated cymose clusters of Gilia and Penstemon as panicles. The inflorescence of Claytonia is commonly described as a raceme, whereas to a more than casual glance it is evidently cymose. Usage of botanical terms can not be settled, like that of botanical names, by a principle of priority; it would not advantage the science to compel taxonomists to adhere to the definitions of Linnaeus. An alternative is to adopt current usage; in view of the somewhat chaotic conditions indicated above, this also seems an unreliable guide. To reverse the old dictum: Res si nescis, perit et cognitio nominum. A rational terminology mirrors that upon which it is based-an understanding of the things concerned. To discuss the terms which have been applied to inflorescences (or to flowers, or to fruits) is to examine the concepts through which our current understanding (or lack of understanding) of these parts has been developed. Such a survey may indicate the problems that await investigation, besides clearing away the accumulated rubbish of the ages. In short, an attempt to arrive at a rational terminology is ipso facto an effort to evaluate scientific concepts and generalizations. Much knowledge of inflorescences has accumulated since the first great flowering of botany in the eighteenth century; and many theories. Unfortunately, names and classes of inflorescences have been proposed under the influence of certain theories now discredited or which ought to be discredited. and in the absence of 187

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    51
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
51
Top 10%
Top 1%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!