Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Economic Botanyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Economic Botany
Article . 1971 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Interspecific hybridization in cucumis

Authors: John R. Deakin; G. W. Bohn; Thomas W. Whitaker;

Interspecific hybridization in cucumis

Abstract

A. The genusCucumis and its close relatives in the family Cucurbitaceae have long supported a disorganized tangle of misinformation resulting from incorrect identification of plant cultures. Several disease resistance surveys and other studies on exotic species of cucurbits have reported information on unverified and often misnamed cultures, but during the past decade many identity errors inCucumis have been corrected by critical inquiry. B. The data from cross-fertility tests are compatible with data from studies on morphology, cytogenetics, phytogeography, and physiology (cucurbitacins). They indicate: 1. C. anguria var.longipes is closely related toC. anguria var.anguria and may be its progenitor. 2. C. leptodermis andC. myriocarpus are related as varieties or subspecies rather than as distinct species. 3. C. zeyheri is no closer than a subspecies toC. prophetarum, and it may be a distinct species. 4. C. dinteri andC. sagittatus are related as varieties or subspecies rather than as distinct species. 5. C.hardwickii andC. sativus are related as varieties rather than as distinct species. C. The cross-fertility studies indicate thatCucumis species can be tentatively organized into four cross-sterile groups: 1. Eight spiny-fruited, African species or varieties ofCucumis are closely related toC. anguria var.anguria, yielding partly fertile hybrids with it. 2. C. metuliferus is not closely related to any other species used in these studies. 3. C. sativus, including many cultivated forms and the spiny-fruited, seven-chromosomeC. hardwickii from India, is not closely related to any of the spiny-fruited, 12-chromosome species from Africa or their cultivated relative,C. anguria var.anguria. 4. The three African species with young fruits hairy and lacking operculate spines (C. humifructus, C. melo and its cultivated forms, and C.sagittatus includingC. dinteri) are more closely related to one another than they are to any of the other species studied. D. Crosses of C. melo with C.sagittatus yield partly developed seeds. Work with additional collections of those species and their close relatives may yield a “bridging species” or form that will permit transfer of genes from other species intoC. melo. Embryo culture techniques may be useful in culturing the minute embryos observed in these crosses. E. The abundance and specific structure of soft spines on fruits in the anguria group appear to be unrelated to cross-fertility barriers. Spine differentiation occurs within as well as between interfertile entities.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    79
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 1%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
79
Top 10%
Top 1%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!