
doi: 10.1007/bf02772672
We continue our research on the relative strength ofL-like combinatorial principles for successors of singular cardinals. In [3] we have shown that the existence of a λ+-special Aronszajn tree does not follow from that of a λ+-Souslin tree. It follows from [5], [4] and [6] that under G.C.H. □λ does imply the existence of a λ+-Souslin tree. In [2] we show that □λ does not follow from the existence of a λ+-special Aronszajn tree. Here we show that the existence of such a tree implies that of an ‘almost Souslin’ λ+-tree. It follows that the statement “All λ+-Aronszajn trees are special” implies that there are no λ+-Aronszajn trees.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
