
doi: 10.1007/bf02745801
The quality of finite element computational results can be assessed only by providing rational criteria for evaluating errors. Most exercises in this direction are based ona posteriori error estimates, based primarily on experience and intuition. If finite element analysis has to be considered a rational science, it is imperative that procedures to computea priori error estimates from first principles are made available. This paper captures some efforts in this direction.
Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics, Error bounds for boundary value problems involving PDEs, Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs
Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics, Error bounds for boundary value problems involving PDEs, Finite element, Rayleigh-Ritz and Galerkin methods for boundary value problems involving PDEs
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
