Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

Primary production in the Patuxent River

Authors: Raymond G. Stross; John R. Stottlemyer;

Primary production in the Patuxent River

Abstract

Rates of production were measured at 22 stations located in a 29-mile segment of the Patuxent River Estuary. The river was sampled in mid-stream at 12 stations which were distributed from a point near solomons, Maryland, to Milltown Landing upstream. Thirteen of the stations were arranged in three transects, which spanned the river in the vicinity of Chalk Point. Standing crops of chlorophyll and rates of photosynthesis were measured at a depth of 1.0 meter on 14 cruises spaced over a 23-month, interval. Concentrations of chlorophyll, and coefficients of carbon assimilation and light extinction were employed to convert estimates at a depth of 1.0 meter to rates of production for the entire water column. Both salinity and thickness of the cuphotic layer showed a considerable gradient in the study area. Salinity increased threefold and thickness of the euphotic zone increased fivefold at the downstream end. The gradient was steepest in the study area upstream of the bridge at Benedict, Maryland. Concentrations of chlorophyll were related to season and position in the estuary. They ranged from 33.3 mg/m3 in October to 3.7 mg/m3 in December, the amplitude being largest at the upstream end of the study area. Average concentration at Station 1 was only 1/3 of the concentration 20 miles upstream at Station 22. The gradient was steeper upstream from the bridge at Benedict. Chlorophyll was least uniformly distributed, in the water column immediately downstream from the bridge. Photosynthetic activity of chlorophyll, at probably subsaturation light intensity, ranged from a mean of 5.21 in August to 1.09 in December. The average for all cruises, when corrected rected to saturation intensities of light, was near a widely accepted value for rates of carbon assimilation per unit of chlorophyll. Rates of carbon assimilation ranged from 2.3 to I48.5 mgC/m3/hr. The months from June through October were the most productive in 1963. However, the Spring of 1964 was con. siderably more productive than was the preceding year, suggesting that the productive period is of longer duration in some years. Seasonal trends in productivity were similar at all stations along a 29-mile segment of the river. The downstream end was only 1/3 as productive on a per-unit-volume basis. Despite the larger rates of production at the upstream end of the study area, the region was least productive per unit of area, owing to the shallowness of the euphotic zone. Mean daily rates for the year were 1.2 gC/m2 for the upstream area and 1.8 gC/m2 for the area downstream from the bridge. The limitations of the computations for the highly turbulent upstream area are discussed.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    23
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
23
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!