
doi: 10.1007/bf02637094
pmid: 8729137
AbstractDietary fat is the number one nutrition concern of Americans. In response to rising consumer demand for reduced‐fat foods, the food industry has developed a multitude of nonfat, lowfat, and reduced‐fat versions of regular food products. To generate reduced‐fat or fat‐free products that have the same organoleptic characteristics of the regular fat version, food manufactures frequently employ fat substitutes in the formulation of these foods. Fat substitutes are made from either carbohydrate, protein, or fat, or a combination of these components. Researchers have questioned the impact of fat substitutes on both fat and caloric intake. The majority of research studies in which fat substitutes were either covertly or overtly substituted for dietary fat indicate that in short‐term, carefully‐controlled conditions, fat substitutes can decrease both dietary fat intake and percentage of calorie intake from fat. However, individuals compensate for the caloric deficit created by the fat substitutes by increasing their consumption of other macronutrients, primarily carbohydrate. The long‐term effect of fat substitutes on the fat intake of free‐living individuals and weight control are unknown. People tend to eat more of a food when they know that food is reduced in fat. Fat substitutes should not be considered a substitute for sound nutrition education and a healthy lifestyle which includes regular exercise.
Food, Formulated, Sucrose, Anticholesteremic Agents, Fatty Acids, Dietary Fats, Eating, Dietary Fats, Unsaturated, Humans, Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic, Dietary Proteins, Fat Substitutes
Food, Formulated, Sucrose, Anticholesteremic Agents, Fatty Acids, Dietary Fats, Eating, Dietary Fats, Unsaturated, Humans, Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic, Dietary Proteins, Fat Substitutes
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 19 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
