
doi: 10.1007/bf02591718
Many methods for solving mixed integer programming problems are based either on primal or on dual decomposition, which yield, respectively, a Benders decomposition algorithm and an implicit enumeration algorithm with bounds computed via Lagrangean relaxation. These methods exploit either the primal or the dual structure of the problem. We propose a new approach, cross decomposition, which allows exploiting simultaneously both structures. The development of the cross decomposition method captures profound relationships between primal and dual decomposition. It is shown that the more constraints can be included in the Langrangean relaxation (provided the duality gap remains zero), the fewer the Benders cuts one may expect to need. If the linear programming relaxation has no duality gap, only one Benders cut is needed to verify optimality.
Large-scale problems in mathematical programming, Lagrangean multipliers, Benders decomposition, capacitated facility location problem, cross- decomposition, Lagrangean relaxation, Numerical mathematical programming methods, primal and dual substructure, Mixed integer programming, mixed integer linear programs, duality gap
Large-scale problems in mathematical programming, Lagrangean multipliers, Benders decomposition, capacitated facility location problem, cross- decomposition, Lagrangean relaxation, Numerical mathematical programming methods, primal and dual substructure, Mixed integer programming, mixed integer linear programs, duality gap
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 128 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
