
In recent volumes ofArchival Science writers have pointed out a postmodernistic approach as fruitful for research in archival science. This means that archival research should take full consideration of the societal context in which archives are produced and used. In this article the author pleads for the need to develop scientific methods in archival science as a whole from this postmodernistic approach. So far the debate on archival science has not taken appropriate consideration of the development of scientific methods of our science. In order to establish the necessary basis for an analysis of the scientific methods of the discipline it is necessary to specify the different areas and subareas of archival science. In this analysis it is vital to be precise about the kind of methods that are applicable to each area.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
