
(Uploaded by Plazi for the Bat Literature Project) Approximately 1 500 angiosperm species, in previous papers, have been sampled for the assessment of the amino acids (a. a.) in their nectar. We reaffirm that the findings provide statistically significant data linking differences ~n the concentration with pollinator type. Flowers that are pollinated by animals that have alternative sources of protein-building a. a.'s show lower a. a. concentration than those that are not. There is a tendency for woody plant nectar a. a.'s to be less concentrated than those of herbaceous plants, but there can be "phylogenetic constraints" which may reduce the correlations of a. a. concentration with pollinator type and with life form. The individual a. a.'s form complements which are qualitatively extremely constant within species. Proline is a normal constituent of many nectars and does not necessarily indicate contamination of the nectar by pollen. Criticism of our findings by GO3"I'SBERCe,R & al. (1984) is answered by reference to our previous publications and those of other workers, and to the presentation of data from California native species, not published previously. All previous postulates are borne out by these new data with the exception of positive correlations of a.a. concentration with "primitive" and "advanced" floral characteristics taken one at a time, which appear to be inconsistent and are affected strongly by the nature of the family in which they occur. Summary data are provided for families and genera which indicate that high or low a.a. concentration can typify certain families and genera of both relatively "primitive" and relatively "advanced" nature. Needs for future research on an ecosystem basis are quoted.
Chiroptera, Mammalia, bats, Animalia, bat, Biodiversity, Chordata
Chiroptera, Mammalia, bats, Animalia, bat, Biodiversity, Chordata
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 134 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
