
If A(x) is a predicate satisfied by exactly one x, then we write Ix.A(x) for that object x. The operator I is called a descriptor. The author reviews the various treatments of descriptors in the literature, pointing out that the problem each treatment faces is ''what to do with Ix.A(x) when \(\exists !xA(x)\) is not (yet) known''. The obvious answer is that it is undefined. The technical contribution of the paper is to show that this obvious answer can be formalized. The author bases his formalization on Scott's E-logic, and shows that ''partial descriptors'' can be added to such a theory conservatively. In a final section, he considers theories with function variables and quantification. In that case descriptors are not conservative, since they yield axioms of choice; but he shows that is all they yield. The paper is very clearly written and to the point.
Scott's E-logic, Metamathematics of constructive systems, descriptor, theories with function variables and quantification, Relative consistency and interpretations
Scott's E-logic, Metamathematics of constructive systems, descriptor, theories with function variables and quantification, Relative consistency and interpretations
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
