Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Studies in Soviet Th...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Studies in Soviet Thought
Article . 1961 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94...
Part of book or chapter of book . 1961 . Peer-reviewed
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

The principle of contradiction in recent Soviet philosophy

Authors: N. Lobkowicz;

The principle of contradiction in recent Soviet philosophy

Abstract

The meeting “On the Questions of Dialectical Contradictions in the Light of Contemporary Science and Practice”, organized by the Institute of Philosophy of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR and held in Moscow in April of 1958, is noteworthy from several points of view even for those who do not normally occupy themselves with questions of Marxism-Leninism. First, to judge from the reports received, this meeting was remarkably objective. Several of the addresses gave evidence of a definite impartiality, unusual in the Soviet context. In the second place, this is the first time that Soviet philosophers have systematically discussed the “dialectical” contradiction, which is the most significant aspect of the Hegelian heritage of their philosophy. Although Hegel’s name appears very seldom, it is evident that the participants form two groups: those who defend the “dialectical” contradiction, “dialectical” logic, in a word, the legacy of Hegel as transmitted by Engels and Lenin; and those who defend formal logic, try to interpret “real” contradictions as polar oppositions and for whom “Hegelian” is almost an insult. Without a doubt, the “strategic” position of the first group is much more favourable since its members can almost invariably count on the support of the “classics”, who prized contradiction and “dialectical” logic very highly. The partisans of the second group find themselves in a particularly uncomfortable situation since they must either bring their defence of reason and logic into agreement with the statements of the “classics” or contradict these same “classics”. That this last possibility actually was realized is the third and most noteworthy fact about the meeting.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    3
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
3
Average
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!