
The need for a study of Soviet philosophic method is, perhaps, seen most clearly in the fact that Western observers are unanimous in characterising contemporary Soviet philosophy as “dogmatic”, while contemporary Soviet philosophers themselves are just as unanimous in maintaining that theirs is a “scientific” philosophy — indeed, the sole scientific philosophy. In order to solve this dilemma we asked ourselves the following questions: “What method (i.e. procedure) do contemporary Soviet philosophers use in the discussion and development of Dialectical Materialism?”1; “To what extent, if any, can this method be called a dogmatic procedure, and to what extent, if any, can it be called scientific?”; “What is the real significance of this method?”; “For what reasons has it been accepted by contemporary Soviet philosophers?”.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
