
doi: 10.1007/bf02390384
pmid: 1665684
Differential diagnosis is a major problem in histopathology of ovarian tumors. Difficulties may arise if the tumor is a poorly differentiated carcinoma or a granulosa cell tumor of the sarcomatoid type. It was the aim of the present study to evaluate the usefulness of immunohistochemistry in differentiating between granulosa cell tumors of the ovary and ovarian carcinomas. We investigated 56 ovarian malignancies (13 granulosa cell tumors, 17 serous, 14 mucinous and 12 poorly differentiated carcinomas) and performed immunohistochemical detection of Vimentin, Keratin, CA125, CA19-9, CEA, S100 and Ber-EP4. Expression of Vimentin was highest and expression of Keratin was lowest in granulosa cell tumors in contrast to carcinomas. CA125 and CA19-9 were not expressed in granulosa cell tumors, whereas the detection rate in carcinomas (except for CA125 in mucinous carcinomas) was high. CEA, S100 and Ber-EP4 do not seem to be useful markers in differential diagnosis. A marker profile of Vimentin, Keratin, CA125 and CA19-9 allows a quite strict differentiation between poorly differentiated ovarian carcinomas and granulosa cell tumors of the ovary.
Ovarian Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ovary, Cystadenocarcinoma, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, Diagnosis, Differential, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Female, Granulosa Cell Tumor
Ovarian Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Ovary, Cystadenocarcinoma, Adenocarcinoma, Mucinous, Diagnosis, Differential, Immunoenzyme Techniques, Biomarkers, Tumor, Humans, Female, Granulosa Cell Tumor
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
