
doi: 10.1007/bf02375027
Most isolates of “sphaerosperma group” fungi described by different authors from leaf-hoppers and frog-hoppers appear to fit intoEntomophthora sphaerossperma (Fresenius)sensu strictoRemaudiereet al. (1976) synonymous withZoophthora radicans (Brefeld)Batko. One of these fungi had been described byRostrup in 1896 as a new species,Entomophthora aphrophorae, but although resemblingZoophthora radicans, it cannot be reliably identified because of its incomplete description.Petch, in 1935, erred in giving under that name a detailed description of a fungus from the same host species, as the 2 were morphologically different.Petch's fungus differs from bothEntomophthora aphrophorae andZoophthora radicans by having longer and wider (by ca. 25%) primary and secondary conidia. It differs from the other species of the “sphaerosperma group” in the shape and/or dimensions and length/width ratio of the different kinds of conidia and capillispores. Accordingly, a new name is proposed for this taxon:Zoophthora petchiBen-Ze'ev & Kenneth, sp. nov.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
