
doi: 10.1007/bf02296263
A combinatorial data analysis strategy is reviewed that is designed to compare two arbitrary measures of proximity defined between the objects from some set. Based on a particular cross-product definition of correspondence between these two numerically specified notions of proximity (typically represented in the form of matrices), extensions are then pursued to indices of partial association that relate the observed pattern of correspondence between the first two proximity measures to a third. The attendant issues of index normalization and significance testing are discussed; the latter is approached through a simple randomization model implemented either through a Monte Carlo procedure or distributional approximations based on the first three moments. Applications of the original comparison strategy and its extensions to partial association may be developed for a variety of methodological and substantive tasks. Besides rank correlation, we emphasize the topics of spatial autocorrelation for one variable and spatial association between two and mention the connection to the usual randomization approach for one-way analysis-of-variance.
significance testing, spatial association, Measures of association (correlation, canonical correlation, etc.), indices of partial association, one-way analysis-of-variance, spatial autocorrelation, permutation tests, Data analysis (statistics), Multivariate analysis, index normalization, randomization model, measures of proximity, combinatorial data analysis, rank correlation
significance testing, spatial association, Measures of association (correlation, canonical correlation, etc.), indices of partial association, one-way analysis-of-variance, spatial autocorrelation, permutation tests, Data analysis (statistics), Multivariate analysis, index normalization, randomization model, measures of proximity, combinatorial data analysis, rank correlation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 51 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
