
doi: 10.1007/bf02259627
Communicating with computers by some means of human or natural language has long been a goal of their users. The very terms "computer language, programming language" illustrate the aim to construct more flexible and more powerful means of communication than is suggested by the simple term "program"' And the development of computer languages like Lisp illustrates steps toward a goal approximating the communication medium for human beings. Yet natural language provides much of its power and flexibility through characteristics which have not been incorporated into computer languages, and may be incorporated only through great ingenuity. For a device lacking the capabilities of the human brain, the properties of human or natural language which provide that power and flexibility will have to be developed by specialists in computing. As has already been learned over two decades of struggle by linguists, humanists, and others who have slowly sought to process natural language as well as, quickly, and in as large quantities as could be done for numbers, the ambiguities of human speech create problems and challenges. In the suc
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
