Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Tropical Animal Heal...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Tropical Animal Health and Production
Article . 1995 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Influence of suckling on calving interval of N'dama cows in the Gambia

Authors: F B, Sanyang; H G, Wagner; D J, Clifford;

Influence of suckling on calving interval of N'dama cows in the Gambia

Abstract

The inhibitory influence of the suckling stimulus on resumption of cyclicity post partum was elucidated for dairy cows by Oxenreider (1968) and for beef cattle by Short et al. (1972). In the traditionally managed herds in West Africa calves suckle their dam initially to stimulate milk let down, the cows are then milked and the calf is allowed to suckle the residual milk. Under such management calves normally suckle their dams for the entire lactation (mean 420 days, s.d. 138.6) as reported by Agyemang et al. (1990). In a trial to study milk conversion in the calf described by Agyemang et al. (1993) cows were allocated at calving to either a group in which they were milked the traditional way (n = 20), or to a group where calves were not allowed to suckle except for the first 4 days (n = 16). In the latter group milk let down was stimulated by oxytocin injection before morning and evening milking. All the cows were managed in the same herd and calved within a range of 2 months to avoid bias due to seasonal or nutritional influences. A fertile bull was always present in the herd. This study continues the work by Agyemang et al. (1993) by analysing the subsequent calving records of the dams to determine the differences in calving interval (CI) between the groups of suckled and non suckled cows. A summary of the data is given in Table I and these were analysed using the Wilcoxon 2 sample test. It was found that 60% of the non suckled cows had a CI of less than 390 days while 60% of the suckled cows had not calved by 480 days postpartum. The difference in the mean between the 2 groups of 138 days in favour of the non suckled group is highly significant (P < 0.01). The fate of 6 animals (37.5%) of the non-suckled group was not known and could not be determined in retrospect. Since these could have been cows with a very high CI a comparison was also made between the mean CI of the non-suckled group and 62-5% of the best animals of the suckled group revealing a reduced mean CI of 50 days in favour of non-suckled cows, 456 days and 406 days respectively.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Birth Intervals, Animals, Lactation, Cattle, Female, Gambia

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    2
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
2
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!