Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao European Journal of ...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases
Article . 1995 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Randomized evaluation of benzathine penicillin V twice daily versus potassium penicillin V three times daily in the treatment of group A streptococcal pharyngitis

Authors: A. Kaufhold;

Randomized evaluation of benzathine penicillin V twice daily versus potassium penicillin V three times daily in the treatment of group A streptococcal pharyngitis

Abstract

In a randomized, prospective, multicenter study the clinical and bacteriological efficacies of three dosage schedules with two different salts of oral penicillin V suspensions (regimen 1: potassium salt of penicillin V, 50,000 U/kg of body weight per day in three divided doses; regimen 2: benzathine salt of penicillin V, 50,000 U/kg of body weight per day in two divided doses; and regimen 3: benzathine salt of penicillin V, 100,000 U/kg of body weight in two divided doses) for the treatment of streptococcal pharyngitis were evaluated. Children with clinical signs of acute pharyngitis and a positive throat culture for group A beta-hemolytic streptococci (GABHS) were eligible. There was no difference between the treatment groups with respect to the overall clinical success rate. Eradication of the original serotype of GABHS from throat cultures was achieved in 87.1 % (regimen 1), 85.5 % (regimen 2) and 87.7 % (regimen 3) of patients. The incidence of potential drug-related adverse events was significantly higher in patients treated with regimen 3. The results of this and earlier studies strongly suggest that oral penicillin given twice daily should be the recommended treatment for the initial treatment of pharyngitis due to GABHS. Doubling the total daily dose is not beneficial in the usual clinical setting. Because of its favorable pharmacokinetics, the benzathine salt of penicillin V appears to be well suited for a twice-a-day dosage schedule.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    8
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
8
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!