
doi: 10.1007/bf01584087
The relative merits of using sequential unconstrained methods for solving: minimizef(x) subject togi(x) ź 0, i = 1, ź, m, hj(x) = 0, j = 1, ź, p versus methods which handle the constraints directly are explored. Nonlinearly constrained problems are emphasized. Both classes of methods are analyzed as to parameter selection requirements, convergence to first and second-order Kuhn-Tucker Points, rate of convergence, matrix conditioning problems and computations required.
Nonlinear programming
Nonlinear programming
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 25 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
