
doi: 10.1007/bf01442879
To date, it is not known whether Davis' inequality holds for two- parameter martingales M, i.e. whether the ``pure'' norms induced by the supremum of the modulus of M and the square root of the sum of squared two-parameter increments are equivalent. There are two relevant ``mixed'' norms associated with quantities described in the following way. Fix one parameter. Take the square root of the sum of squared increments of M as a martingale in the other direction. Then take the supremum of the resulting submartingale over the previously fixed parameter. We show by establishing inequalities of the Davis type, that these are equivalent to the pure square sum norm and extend them to the continuous parameter case and to more general Orlicz norms.
510.mathematics, Generalizations of martingales, quadratic variation, Orlicz norms, martingale inequalities, two-parameter martingales, inequalities of Davis type, Martingales with discrete parameter, Martingales with continuous parameter, Article
510.mathematics, Generalizations of martingales, quadratic variation, Orlicz norms, martingale inequalities, two-parameter martingales, inequalities of Davis type, Martingales with discrete parameter, Martingales with continuous parameter, Article
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
