<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.1007/bf01403090
For a self-map f of a compact connected polyhedron X the Nielsen number N(f) of f is defined to be the number of essential fixed point classes of f. N(f) is a lower bound for the number of fixed points of every map homotopic to f. This lower bound is known to be realizable if X has no local separating points and X is not a surface (closed or with boundary) of negative Euler characteristic [the author, Am. J. Math. 102, 749-763 (1980; Zbl 0455.55001)]. The realization problem of N(f) for self-maps of surfaces is a long- standing question, and this is exactly the question the author answers. Making an essential use of braid theory the author gives an example of a self-map f of a surface (here a disc with two holes) such that \(N(f)=0\) while every map homotopic to f has at least two fixed points, and thus shows that N(f) is not realizable in general for self-maps of surfaces.
fixed points, self-maps of surfaces, Topology of the Euclidean \(2\)-space, \(2\)-manifolds, essential fixed point classes, braid theory, Nielsen number, Article, 510.mathematics, Fixed points and coincidences in algebraic topology, Knots and links in the \(3\)-sphere, Degree, winding number, self-map of a compact connected polyhedron
fixed points, self-maps of surfaces, Topology of the Euclidean \(2\)-space, \(2\)-manifolds, essential fixed point classes, braid theory, Nielsen number, Article, 510.mathematics, Fixed points and coincidences in algebraic topology, Knots and links in the \(3\)-sphere, Degree, winding number, self-map of a compact connected polyhedron
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 73 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |