
doi: 10.1007/bf01399692
The author proposes an iterative algorithm for solving linear complementarity problems with symmetric positive definite tridiagonal matrices. Such problems are well known to be equivalent to strictly convex quadratic programs whose constraints consist exclusively of simple lower bounds on all the variables. The linear complementarity problems with such (Stieltjes) matrices have been studied earlier, but only in the (Minkowski) case where the off-diagonal entries are nonpositive. Problems of the kind considered in this paper can always be solved in principle by many existing methods. For large scale instances, iterative (indirect) methods are particularly attractive because they preserve sparsity which can definitely be lost when pivoting (direct) methods are applied. The author transforms the equivalent quadratic programming formulation into another quadratic program to which he applies conjugate duality theory to obtain an essentially unconstrained dual problem. The latter is then treated with Newton's method.
linear complementarity problems, iterative algorithm, strictly convex quadratic programs, Quadratic programming, Article, conjugate duality theory, unconstrained dual problem, 510.mathematics, Newton's method, Numerical mathematical programming methods, superlinear convergence, Complementarity and equilibrium problems and variational inequalities (finite dimensions) (aspects of mathematical programming)
linear complementarity problems, iterative algorithm, strictly convex quadratic programs, Quadratic programming, Article, conjugate duality theory, unconstrained dual problem, 510.mathematics, Newton's method, Numerical mathematical programming methods, superlinear convergence, Complementarity and equilibrium problems and variational inequalities (finite dimensions) (aspects of mathematical programming)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
