
doi: 10.1007/bf01325120
pmid: 3558877
The results of five annual surveys of second year medical students over an eight year period of time (1978-1985) concerning perceptions and attitudes toward public health and a course in preventive medicine and community health are presented. The questionnaire format was a combined fixed alternate and free response type and was structured to require only ten to 15 minutes for its completion. Participation rates were generally high varying from 60.2% (1980) to 93.8% (1985). The majority of students in all years favorably evaluated most components of structure, content and presentation of the course. It was found that opinions about the course can be modified by the introduction of variables that are unrelated to the scope of the quality of the course as occurred in 1979, with a difficult midterm examination. Student anger over this examination was translated and expressed as negative opinion about many other aspects of the course which in other years were highly rated. This finding underscores the vulnerability of surveys of subjective opinion and demonstrates that course evaluations must include other objective aspects in addition to student perceptions.
Students, Medical, Attitude of Health Personnel, New York, Social Perception, Community Medicine, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Curriculum, Educational Measurement, Preventive Medicine, Public Health, Education, Medical, Undergraduate
Students, Medical, Attitude of Health Personnel, New York, Social Perception, Community Medicine, Surveys and Questionnaires, Humans, Curriculum, Educational Measurement, Preventive Medicine, Public Health, Education, Medical, Undergraduate
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
