
doi: 10.1007/bf01303043
The authors study valued function fields, i.e. function fields of one variable with valuation on the constant field and a prolongation to the function fields such that the corresponding residue fields are again function fields in one variable. They introduce the vector space defect for a non-archimedean valued vector space over a valued field (which generalizes classical invariants of the valued field extensions). This vector space defect can be approximated by quotients of the degree of large positive divisors by the degrees of certain residual divisors. As an application they show that equality of the genus and residual genus, greater than 1, characterizes the valued function fields having good reduction. Finally, they show that the vector space defect is closely related to the henselian defect of the valued function field and show that over a henselian base field these two defects coincide. In the last section the authors prove the inequality \[ \chi (F| K)\leq 1-s+\sum_{1\leq i\leq s}e_ i\delta_ i\chi (Fv_ i| Kv_ i) \] where \((F| K,v_ i)\) are valued function fields with \(v_ i| K=v_ j| K=v\) on the exact constant field K and \(Fv_ i\) and \(Kv_ i\) are corresponding residue fields.
non-archimedean valued vector space, valued function fields, good reduction, genus, Article, vector space defect, henselian defect, residual divisors, 510.mathematics, Non-Archimedean valued fields, Valued fields, residual genus
non-archimedean valued vector space, valued function fields, good reduction, genus, Article, vector space defect, henselian defect, residual divisors, 510.mathematics, Non-Archimedean valued fields, Valued fields, residual genus
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
