
doi: 10.1007/bf01198786
This paper proves some Skorokhod convergence theorems for processes with filtration. Roughly, these are theorems which say that if a family of processes with filtration \((X^ n,{\mathcal F}^ n)\), \(n\in {\mathbb{N}}\), converges in distribution in a suitable sense, then there exists a family of equivalent processes \((Y^ n,{\mathcal G}^ n)\), \(n\in {\mathbb{N}}\), which converges almost surely. The notion of equivalence used is that of adapted distribution, which guarantees that each \((Y^ n,{\mathcal G}^ n)\) has the same stochastic properties as \((X^ n,{\mathcal F}^ n)\) with respect to its filtration, such as the martingale property or the Markov property. The appropriate notion of convergence in distribution is convergence in adapted distribution, which is developed in the paper. Fortunately, any tight sequence of processes has a subsequence which converges in adapted distribution. For discrete time processes, \((Y^ n,{\mathcal G}^ n)\), \(n\in {\mathbb{N}}\), and their limit (Y,\({\mathcal G})\) may be taken as all having the same fixed filtration \({\mathcal G}^ n={\mathcal G}\). In the continuous time case, the \((Y^ n,{\mathcal G}^ n)'s\) may require different filtrations \({\mathcal G}^ n\), which converge to \({\mathcal G}\). To handle this, convergence of filtrations is defined and its theory developed.
Strong limit theorems, convergence in distribution, convergence of filtrations, Central limit and other weak theorems, Martingales with discrete parameter, Skorokhod convergence theorems, Convergence of probability measures
Strong limit theorems, convergence in distribution, convergence of filtrations, Central limit and other weak theorems, Martingales with discrete parameter, Skorokhod convergence theorems, Convergence of probability measures
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
